Monday, August 29, 2011

No proposal to increase the Retirement Age of Central Government Servants...

The Central Government clarified that there is no proposal to extend the retirement age of Central Government Employees.

In Rajya Sabha, the Minister of State for Finance Namo Narain Meena told that the total number of Central Government Employees as on March, 2010 was 32.24 Lakh and “at present we have no idea to increase the retirement age of Central Government Employees from 60 to 62”.

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Central govt employees’ retirement age to be extended by 2 years to 62

New Delhi: The government is planning to extend the retirement age of all central government employees by two years — from the current 60 to 62 years. Sources said that an in-principle decision has been taken in this regard and the department of personnel and training (DoPT) has begun the work to implement the same. A formal announcement to this effect is expected this year itself.


The last time the government extended the retirement age of central government employees was in 1998. It was also a two-year extension from 58. This was preceded by the implementation of the 5th Pay Commission, which had put severe strain on government’s finances. Subsequently, all state governments followed the Centre’s policy by extending the retirement age by two years. Public sector undertakings followed suit too.

The decision to extend the retirement age is well-timed both politically and economically.

The UPA government reckons the move would be a masterstroke. At a time when it is buffeted by several corruption cases, it is felt that the extension of the retirement age will go down well with the middle classes. Economically also, the move makes sense because by deferring payment of lump sum retirement benefits for a large number of employees by two years, the government would be able to manage its finances better.

“An in-principle decision has been taken to increase the retirement age by two years within this year itself. This would reduce the burden on the fisc from one-time payment of retirement benefits for employees including defence and railways personnel,” an official involved in the discussion said. With the fiscal consolidation high on the government's agenda, this deferment would come handy.

There’s some flip side too if the retirement age is extended by two years. Those officials empanelled as secretaries and joint secretaries would have to wait longer to actually get the posts. And of course, there is the issue of average age profile of the civil servants being turning north.

It is also felt that any extension is not being fair with a bulk of people who still look for jobs in the government.

However, officials point out that at least it prevents an influential section of the bureaucracy to hanker for post-retirement jobs with the government like chairmanship of regulatory bodies or tribunals.

“As it is, a sizeable section of senior civil servants work for three to five years after the retirement in some capacity or the other in the government,” said a senior government official. The retirement age of college teachers and judges are also beyond 60.

As per a study, the future pension outgo for the existing Central and State government employees is estimated at a staggering R1,735,527 crore or 55.88% of GDP at market prices of 2004-05.

                                                                                                 Wed, 2 Aug 2011

Rate of DA Before and After Sixth Pay Commission

After 6CPC

1st Jan 2011 – 51%
1st July 2010 – 45%
1st Jan 2010 – 35%
1st July 2009 – 27%
1st Jan 2009 – 22%
1st July 2008 – 16%
1st Jan 2008 – 12%
1st July 2007 – 9%
1st Jan 2007 – 6%
1st July 2006 – 2%
1st Jan 2006 – 0

Before 6CPC

1st Jan 2009
1st July 2008 – 54%
1st Jan 2008 – 47%
1st Jul 2007 – 41%
1st Jan 2007 – 35%
1st Jul 2006 – 29%
1st Jan 2006 – 24%
1st Jul 2005 – 21%
1st Jan 2005 – 17%
1st Jul 2004 – 14%
1st Apr 2004 (DA Merger) 11%
1st Jan 2004 – 61%
1st Jul 2003 – 59%
1st Jan 2003 – 55%
1st Jul 2002 – 52%
1st Jan 2002 – 49%
1st Jul 2001 – 45%
1st Jan 2001 – 43%
1st Jul 2000 – 41%
1st Jan 2000 – 38%
1st Jul 1999 – 37%
1st Jan 1999 – 32%
1st Jul 1998 – 22%
1st Jan 1998 – 16%
1st Jul 1997 – 13%
1st Jan 1997 – 8%
1st Jul 1996 – 4%
1st Jan 1996 –0

Revise travel entitlements for privilege passes- Clarification


RBE No. 35/2011


GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(RAILWAY BOARD)




No. E(W)2008/PS 5-1/38                                               New Delhi, the 14th March, 2011

The General Managers
All Zonal Railways, Production Units, etc.



Sub:  Revise travel entitlements for privilege passes- Clarification reg. Ref:   This office letter of even number dated 6-1-2011and 3-2-2011.


Clarification has been sought whether the passes on 2010 year ending account due to the employees shall be as per revised entitlements.

2.       The  matter  has  been  examined and  it  is  clarified  that  since  the  revised entitlements are effective from  6-1-2011, any pass issued on or after  06-01-2011, including 2010 year ending pass, shall be as per the revised entitlements.

3.       This issues with the concurrence of the Finance Directorate of the Ministry of
Railways.


4.       Receipt of this letter may please be acknowledged.



(Debasis Mazumdar) Joint Director Establishment (Welfare)
··   .     Railway  Board.


No. E(W)2008/PS 5-1/38

New Delhi, the 14th March, 2011


Copy to:
The Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General of India (Railways), Room No. 224, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi (with 40 spares).